U.S. wallets traded $571M on Polymarket's political markets — despite being banned from the platform
On-chain analysis firm Allium found U.S.-linked wallets traded about $571 million on Polymarket's political markets over the past year — the largest national share — despite the platform being barred from serving American users.
Americans are legally shut out of Polymarket. Over the past 12 months they were still, by one measure, its largest national political-betting crowd.
U.S.-linked wallets traded roughly $571 million in notional value across Polymarket's political markets in the trailing year — more than any other country, and ahead of Hong Kong's $422 million — according to a report from on-chain analysis firm Allium, reported by CoinDesk (July 3). Polymarket blocks U.S. users by IP address because it cannot legally serve them. Allium's argument is that the block does little: the platform runs on a crypto wallet and stablecoins with no bank or broker in the middle, so a VPN plus an existing wallet is enough to get past it. Because Allium tags countries from on-chain wallet behavior rather than IP, a VPN that fools Polymarket's block does not hide a U.S. wallet from the data.
That mechanism cuts both ways as a caveat, and it's the key one: Allium can tie only about 6% of Polymarket's political-market wallets to any country, and says its own figures should be read as directional, not exact.
What Americans bet on is the sharper finding. Geopolitics made up 46% of U.S. notional versus 36% platform-wide, while elections drew just 16% from U.S. wallets against 32% for everyone else — U.S. traders backed foreign-war markets at nearly three times the rate they backed elections. Five of the U.S. cohort's twelve biggest markets were bets on the Iran war; its single largest, at $20.8 million, was a novelty market on whether Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy would wear a suit. Those are largely the markets regulated U.S. venues don't carry — Kalshi and Polymarket's compliant U.S. arm stick mostly to economic data, rate decisions and elections.
Key facts
- ~$571M U.S.-linked notional on Polymarket political markets, trailing 12 months; $422M from Hong Kong (Allium, via CoinDesk).
- Only ~6% of political-market wallets are country-tagged; Allium calls the numbers directional (Allium).
- Geopolitics 46% of U.S. notional vs 36% platform-wide; elections 16% vs 32% (Allium).
- Largest single U.S. market: $20.8M on a Zelenskyy-suit novelty bet (Allium, via CoinDesk).
- U.S. wallets backed winners 81.9% of the time vs 80.3% for others — no edge (Allium).
The real-world read
The eye-catching number is one on-chain firm's estimate built on tagging just 6% of wallets — Allium says so itself, and the $571M should be read as an order-of-magnitude signal, not a ledger figure. The headline "biggest national crowd" rests on that thin base. Note what the data undercuts, not just what it shows: the fear that offshore access lets insiders or savvy Americans clean up isn't visible here — U.S. wallets picked winners at 81.9% versus 80.3% for everyone, effectively no edge, and even bet more boldly (53% on a U.S. invasion of Iran when the market sat at 26%) without doing better. Polymarket did not respond to CoinDesk's request for comment. And this is a single secondary source relaying one vendor's analysis; the primary on-chain dataset was not independently reviewed here.
Opinion, and whose
CoinDesk frames the finding as a "policy dilemma" for regulators — whether to bring such markets onshore or leave the largest single political market offshore, visible on-chain but beyond U.S. oversight. That read is the outlet's, not an established fact.
Sources
- CoinDesk (Tier 2, secondary), July 3, 2026 — reporting on Allium's figures, the U.S./Hong Kong split, category breakdowns and win rates. Not marketing.
- Allium (on-chain analysis firm, cited by CoinDesk) — the underlying wallet-tagging data; a vendor whose own report flags its 6%-coverage limitation.
This is news coverage, not financial or legal advice. Prediction-market access varies by jurisdiction.